Writing book reviews is really not my thing
The review should include:
1. The subject of analysis (topic, genre reviewed paper)
2. The relevance of the ideas of a literary work
3. Comparative analysis with other similar works
4. Overall assessment of the work of the reviewer
5. Faults, defects
6. The reviewer's conclusions The popularity of the review due to the brevity of its form. The reader can get an impression about the book, not manipulative-enthusiastic, which gives it a publisher's annotation, and detached-subjective.